← Home Seven PriusMED →
Systemic Design / Launch Operations

How a Food Court Metaphor Reimagined Rocket Launch Operations

A five-day systemic design inquiry helped a launch organization move beyond optimizing individual launches and begin imagining a continuous operating model.

Rocket launch

The challenge wasn’t simply launching more rockets.

The range was being asked to behave more like an airport — supporting accelerating launch tempo, simultaneous activity, faster stand-ups, and less friction across missions, infrastructure, partners, and providers.

300+annual launch cadence envisioned
2–3launches in a day
24 hrrapid stand-ups
My Role

Design the conditions for the team to question its own operating model.

I designed the logic of the sprint, facilitated the arc across five days, protected the team from converging too quickly on familiar answers, synthesized the wall-level learning, and translated the emerging concept into a sponsor-ready narrative.

Frame

Turn a planning challenge into a systemic design inquiry.

Facilitate

Sequence divergence and convergence across five days.

Protect

Keep the room from jumping back to familiar solutions.

Synthesize

Harvest drawings, critique, and discussion.

Translate

Make the idea legible enough for sponsor challenge.

Process

Frame Burn process.

01

Legacy Frame

Surface the existing system, assumptions, relationships, and dominant paradigm.

02

Alternative Frames

Challenge the legacy frame through different perspectives and ways of seeing the system.

03

Multiple Futures

Explore divergent futures to reveal new opportunities, risks, and consequences.

04

Prototype Future Concept

Make a promising future tangible enough to explore, challenge, and refine.

05

Reframing + Implementation

Translate what emerged into a new frame and a path toward action.

01 / Surface the Frame

Before redesigning the system, draw the system you think you have.

The first artifact was intentionally crude. Its value wasn’t accuracy — it externalized a deeply familiar operating logic and made it discussable.

“The whiteboard became a mirror.”
Food court metaphor drawingPrototype metaphor developed by the team
04 / Prototype

The metaphor that unlocked the room: a food court.

Instead of describing a slightly better process, the team started imagining a fundamentally different relationship between government, launch providers, and customers.

Landlord: set rules, standards, and shared infrastructure.
Providers: operate with greater autonomy inside a defined envelope.
Kiosk: give customers a simpler front door to the system.

Emerging Concept

From central manager to ecosystem enabler.

The metaphor evolved into a “spaceport as platform” operating model — shared standards, infrastructure, data, interfaces, and decision rhythms supporting greater provider autonomy without eliminating government’s essential role.

Spaceport as platform conceptEmerging operating model
Result
Approved
to proceed.

After five days of systemic design and a leadership sponsor stress test, the team was directed to continue refining the concept and move it into the next stage of development.

Approved to proceed resultThe sprint earned another round of investment
Good strategic design does more than produce concepts. It changes the quality of the questions people are willing to ask.
Next Story / PriusMED

What if the Emergency Room Could Come to the Patient?